Shaking hands during the khutbah

Ash-Shaykh Muhammad bin Saalih al-Uthaymeen, rahimahullah, said :

أما مصافحته فإنه لا بأس بها وإن كان الأولى أيضاً عدم المصافحة، وغمزه ليشعر بأن هذا ليس موضع مصافحة؛ لأن في المصافحة نوعاً من العبث الذي قد يخرج الإنسان عن تمام الاستماع للخطبة.

“As for shaking the hands (during the khutbah) then there is no harm in it although what is better is not to shake hands (during the khutbah), rather he should indicate to him (i.e. through his body language), in order that the person realizes that this is not the time for shaking hands ; since shaking hands is a type of distraction which can take the person out of the zone of giving full attention in listening to the khutbah… ”

Reference :Majmoo’u Fataawa of al-Uthaymeen volume 16, chapter : yawmul jumah.

The Ruling on Taking Pictures of Things Which have a Soul in it Through Modern Day Devices

The Ruling on Taking Pictures of Things Which have a Soul in it Through Modern Day Devices and The Ruling on Saving Such Images to ones Device ,

Ash-Shaykh Zayd al-Madkhalee,  Rahimahullah,  was asked the following question,

: ما حكم التصوير بالجوال؟ فأنا أقوم بتصوير ابني بدون ضرورة و هل علي مسح صوره من الجوال أو الكمبيوتر؟

The Question :”What is the ruling on taking a picture through a cellphone,  whereas I would take a picture of my son without there be a necessity for it and is it a must upon me to delete his pictures from the cellphone and the laptop? ”

الجواب: “…قضية التصوير ظاهر الأدلة من السنٌة أن جميع التصوير بالوسائل المختلفة سواءً الحادثة في هذا الزمن أو غيره أنه حرام و لا يستثنى منه إلا ما دعت إليه الحاجة أو الضرورة

The Answer : “… As for the matter of picture taking, what is apparent from the texts of the Sunnah that picture-taking in all of its various means whether it be by the modern day means or other than it, it is indeed haraam nothing from it is exempted except what there is a (dire) need and necessity for”

فما كان بدون حاجة و لا تلجأ إليه ضرورة فاالأصل التحريم و هو من الكبائر و على هذا مشى الشيخ عبد العزيز ابن باز ـ رحمه الله ـ يرى بأن التحريم عام بأي وسيلة من الوسائل كان

“Whatever there is no need for and no daroorah for, the origin is that it is impermissible while it is from the major sins and upon this was the stance of Ash-Shaykh Abdul Azeez bin Baaz –  rahimahullah – he would see that the prohibition is general, no matter through what means it was done by ”

التصوير مع أن بعض العلماء المعاصرين فرق بين إشتقاق الصورة و بين نحتها و الأحاديث تبقى على عمومها حتى يأتي ما يخصص من النصوص الصحيحة و لا مخصص .

“Picture taking although some of the modern scholars made a distinction between extracting the picture and carving it out, the hadeeths should be left general up until it comes what will make it specific (restricted) from the authentic proofs while there is nothing to make it specific”

فالخلاصة الذي يصور بأي وسيلة من الوسائل بدون ضرورة تلجأه إلى ذلك فقد وقع في المحظور فعليه أن يرحم نفسه فالوعيد شديد لعن النبي صلى الله عليه و سلم المصورينو قال: “من صور صورة كلف أن ينفخ فيها الروح و ليس بنافخ”

“The summary is whosoever takes a picture through whatever means it may be without there being a daroorah for that, then he has indeed fell into what has been prohibited, so it is upon him to show mercy upon himself for verily the threat (pertaining to it) is severe ; The Prophet sallahu alayhi wa salaam, cursed the picture makers while He said : Whoever makes a picture will be held responsible (on the day of resurrection) to breathe a spirit into it and he is not one who can breathe such ‘

 فهي كبيرة من كبائر الذنوب و إن تساهل فيها معظم الناس فما كان لضرورة و حاجة ملٌحة فعند الضرورة يباح المحظور. ” اهـ

“Therefore it is a major sin from the major sins although most of the people are lenient regarding it,  so whenever there is a daroorah and a dire need for it there then due to the daroorah what was prohibited becomes permissible ”

Also The Shaykh, Rahimahullah,  was asked the following question,

The Question :”What is the ruling on taking pictures through a cell phone or what is the ruling on saving the image on this device? ”

The Answer:”Picture taking is not permissible except if for a (dire) need, if there is a need for it which is a daroorah then it becomes permissible to take pictures or else if there is no daroorah for it then it is not permissible to take pictures whether it be through the means of a cellphone or through other means”

Reference: http://safeshare.tv/w/XDteduAIQa

Likewise Ash-Shaykh Abdul-Muhsin al-Abaad, Rahimahullah,  was asked the following question,

The Question : “What is the ruling on taking photographs or taking pictures through the device of a camera?”

The Answer : “All of that is considered to be picture-making while picture-making is permissible for a necessity and as for what is used from it for memorials and other than that then it is not allowed”

Reference: http://safeshare.tv/w/verPJOJoyE

The Ruling On Paying Debts To A Drug Dealer – Shaikh Ibn Uthaymeen

Question:

A man had the habit of using drugs, then he repented and Allah guided him to the straight path. So what is your guidance for him and the one who is in a similar situation? If he has debts due to people for these drugs or people request money from him due to these drugs, does he take the money he has and pay what is owing on him knowing it is for drugs?

Answer:

First: We congratulate this man whom Allah blessed with steadfastness and leaving off nonsense affairs and the destroyers of the souls. We say, ‘All praise is due to Allah for this rescue which by it you have been saved.’

Second: everything that he earned from this unlawful way is unlawful upon him. However, as for what is with him then Allah, the Exalted said:

فَمَنْ جَاءَهُ مَوْعِظَةٌ مِنْ رَبِّهِ فَانتَهَى فَلَهُ مَا سَلَفَ وَأَمْرُهُ إِلَى اللَّه

So whosoever receives an admonition from his Lord and stops eating Riba (usury) shall not be punished for the past; his case is for Allah (to judge);

[2:275]

Except that if he has the drugs themselves, then it is obligatory to destroy them. As for the receivables of the people, then he has taken it from them. However, he gives it in charity to free himself from it, not as a means to draw near to Allah. It is not possible that he returns it to the people so that they combine between the compensation [for the product] and the product. Rather we say: take what is from their receivables and give it in charity and do not enter it into your wealth. Rather, give it as charity to get rid of it and that will solve the issue.

As for what he owes the people for the cost of these drugs, then he should prevent paying it back. He should say, ‘I will not pay you because this is something unlawful. Unlawful things do not have price in the legislation.’ However, in this situation, he gives charity in the amount he took from the people so that he does not combine between having the compensation [for the product] and the product.

[Liqaa ash-Shahri no. 15 found here]

Translated by

Faisal Ibn Abdul Qaadir Ibn Hassan
Abu Sulaymaan

Should A Former Gang Member Turn Himself In If He Repented – Shaikh Abdul-Muhsin Al-Abbaad

Question:

A man in the disbelieving lands was involved in a group (gang) that used to loot and steal. Then he repented and made his repentance good. The government is looking for him now. Is his repentance sufficient or should he turn himself in to the government?

Answer:

If he repented, Allah returns to the one who repents to him. However, the rights of the people are upon him. If he knows the people, then he returns it to them. If he does not know them, then he gives charity on their behalf. If he repented, then he does not turn himself in. If they take him or something happens, perhaps Allah, if he is truthful, He will make his affair easy and make a way out for him. If something happens and they take him however, he must give the rights to its people.”

[Sharh Sunan Ibn Majah no. 98]

Translated by

Faisal Ibn Abdul Qaadir Ibn Hassan
Abu Sulaymaan

Rainfall is one of the legislated excuses to not attend the congregation

Rainfall is one of the legislated excuses to not attend the congregation

Proof:

ابْنُ عُمَرَ فِي لَيْلَةٍ بَارِدَةٍ بِضَجْنَانَ ثُمَّ قَالَ صَلُّوا فِي رِحَالِكُمْ، فَأَخْبَرَنَا أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم كَانَ يَأْمُرُ مُؤَذِّنًا يُؤَذِّنُ، ثُمَّ يَقُولُ عَلَى إِثْرِهِ، أَلاَ صَلُّوا فِي الرِّحَالِ‏.‏ فِي اللَّيْلَةِ الْبَارِدَةِ أَوِ الْمَطِيرَةِ فِي السَّفَرِ

Narrated Nafi`:
Once in a cold night, Ibn `Umar pronounced the Adhan for the prayer at Dajnan (the name of a mountain) and then said, “Pray at your homes”, and informed us that Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) used to tell the Mu’adh-dhin to pronounce Adhan and say, “Pray at your homes” at the end of the Adhan on a rainy or a very cold night during the journey.”

[Saheeh Bukhari no. 632]

Hafidh Ibn Hajr rahimahullah said:

وترجم عليه البخاري غير ترجمة الباب والذي قبله الرخصة في الصلاة في الرحال عند المطر
“Bukhari put a title other than the title of the chapter. The one before it is the allowance for the people to pray in the house when it israining”

[Fathul Bari]

And also:

عَنْ جَابِرٍ، قَالَ كُنَّا مَعَ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم فِي سَفَرٍ فَأَصَابَنَا مَطَرٌ فَقَالَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ “‏ مَنْ شَاءَ فَلْيُصَلِّ فِي رَحْلِهِ

Jabir narrated:
“We were with the Prophet on a journey when it started to rain on us, so the Prophet (S) said: ‘Whoever wishes, let him perform Salat in his place.'”

[Saheeh Tirmidhi no. 409]

Imam al-Mubaarakfoori rahimahullah said in commentary:

فيه دليل على أن الصلاة في الرحال لعذر المطر ونحوه رخصة وليست بعزيمة

“In this is evidence that prayer is in the homes due to the excuse of rain and the likes and is an allowance and not an obligation”

[Tuhfatul-Ahwadhi]
Shaikh Ibn ul-‘Uthaymeen rahimahullah:

“From the excuses also is if there rain and mud. In that is difficulty to attend the masaajid. So a person prays in his house. Otherwise, the origin is the obligation of attending the congregational prayer for every man in the masjid”

[Noor ‘ala Darb no. 206]
This is because there is difficulty in going to the masjid. As for light rain, then one must still attend the congregation.

Shaikh Ibn ul-‘Uthaymeen rahimahullah said:

“If it does not harm him such that the rain is light, then there is no excuse. Rather it is obligatory upon him to attend the congregation. And what afflicts him of little difficulty, then he is rewarded”

[Sharh Mumti’ (4/318)]

And Allah Knows Best

Faisal Ibn Abdul Qaadir Ibn Hassan
Abu Sulaymaan

Ruling for praying at home if the masjid is far away

Ruling for praying at home if the masjid is far away
Question:

I live in a house far from the masjid and I am forced to drive the car to the salaat. And if I walk on foot (to the masjid), then I sometimes miss the salaat (completely). Knowing that I can hear the adhaan over the loud speakers, then if I prayed in my house or prayed with three or four of my neighbours at another house, is this considered a serious matter? Please benefit me. May Allaah reward you with good.
Answer:

The duty on you is that your make salaat with your Muslim brothers in the masjid if you hear the call in your shop naturally, without needing something that amplifies the low and hard to hear sounds. Then if you are distant and you do not hear the sound of the call (adhaan) without the sound being amplified, then it becomes permissible for you to pray in your house or with some of your neighbours.
And it is established from the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) who said to a blind man who asked for permission to pray in his house: “Do you hear the call to prayer?” He said: ‘Yes’ He (صلى الله عليه وسلم) said: “Respond to it”. (Collected by Imaam Muslim in his Saheeh)

And his saying (صلى الله عليه وسلم): “Whoever heard the call (adhaan) and he did not come to it (the prayer), then there is no prayer for him except with an excuse”. (Narrated by Ibn Maajah, ad-Daraqutni, Ibn Hibbaan, and al-Haakim with a Saheeh chain)

And when you answer the muaddhin and you are distant and you endured the hardship on your feet or in the car, then there is a goodness for you and it is preferred and Allaah will write in your records that you went to the masjid and returned from it with sincerity and correct intention.

And it is established from the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم): He said to a man whose house was far from al-Masjid an-Nabawi and he never missed the prayer (in congregation) with the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم). It was said to him: If you were to buy a donkey you could ride upon it in the dark nights and in the burning sand. He said: I do not like my house to be situated by the side of the masjid, for I (eagerly) desire that my steps towards the masjid and back from it, should be recorded when I return to my family. Upon this the Messenger of Allah (صلى الله عليه وسلم) said: “Allaah has gathered all (rewards) for you”. (Collected by Imaam Muslim in his Saheeh)

Shaykh `Abdul-`Azeez Bin Baz
Kitaab ad-Da’wah, Volume Two, Question 103
http://www.masjiduthaymeen.org

THE RULING ON CUTTING THE HAIR IN DIFFERENT LEVELS – SHAIKH ABDUL-MUHSIN AL-‘ABBAD

THE RULING ON CUTTING THE HAIR IN DIFFERENT LEVELS – SHAIKH ABDUL-MUHSIN AL-‘ABBAD

Question: Cutting the hair in different levels, such that the top is longer than the hair on the sides?

Answer: “What is apparent is that it resembles Qaza’ because Qaza’ is to shave some of the head and leave other parts. And this is shortening some of the head and leaving other parts. He should either shorten all of it or leave all of it just as in shaving the head. He shaves all of it or leaves all of it”.

[Sharh Ibn Majah no. 259]

Translated by

Faisal Ibn Abdul Qaadir Ibn Hassan
Abu Sulaymaan

Fasting of Ashurah

Fasting of Ashurah

Imaam nawawee said (may Allah have mercy on him)

in the explanation of Saheeh Muslim in the chapter: Fasting on the day of Al-‘Ashurah” the consensus of the scholars is upon that the fast of ashurah is Sunnah”

Was the fasting of Ashurah obligatory or was it just Sunnah always?

There are two opinions in this

the first:

That it was mustahab (Encouraged) only and this is the opinion of the Jamhoor (Majority of the scholars).

They use as a proof the narration of Mua’awiyah bin Abee Sufiyaan in the Saheeheen (Bukhaari & Muslim) he said ” I heard the Messenger of Allah saying ” Verily this the day of Al-‘Ashurah and Allah has not written upon you it’s fast( i.e. made it waajib) so whoso ever will fast and whoso ever wills leave it” :Bukhaari 2003 Muslim 1129

The second:

That it was waajib (obligatory) then it was abrogated and it became mustahab (Encouraged) when fasting ramadaan was made obligatory. this is the opinion of Imaam Ahmed, Hannifa, an opinion with Shafiee and it is it is deemed to be the correct opinion by a group of Muhagigeen (checkers of books) like Ibn Hazam, As-Shookanie and before them Hafith Ibn Hajar and other than them.

They use as proof for this as which follows:

1) The narration of Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) said ” Quraish use to fast ashurah in the days of Jahiliyyah (Ignorance) and the Messenger use to fast it, when he migrated to Madeenah he fasted it and he commanded it to be fast, but when the month of ramadaan was made obligatory he said ” he who wills can fast and he who wills can leave it” Bukhaari 1893 and Muslim 1125

2) The narration of Abee mosa (may Allah be pleased with him) in the Saheeheen he said ” verily the prophet said ” Fast it you” (i.e. the companions) may Allah be pleased with them all

3) The narration of Salam bin Akwa’a and Al-Rabbe Bint Mua’ad (may Allah be pleased with them both) in the Saheeheen that the prophet of Allah said ” Whoever ate let him complete what is left of his day (i.e. carry on eating) and whoever did not eat let him complete his fast”

As for the Hadeeth of Mua’awiyah bin Abee Sufiyaan (may Allah be pleased with him) ” and Allah has not written it’s fast upon you” It is said by Ibn Qudaamah (may Allah have mercy on him) ” It is held upon(the Hadeeth of Mua’awiyah bin Abee Sufiyaan) the meaning that it is not obligatory upon you now, what helps this is that Mua’awiyah was among the latter Muslim (i.e. to submit to Islaam)

The sheikh holds that the second opinion in the correct one then he says “Allah know best”

Taken for “Fath-ul-A’laam” by Sheikh Mahammed Hizaam Volume 2 Kitab-ul-Siyaam

Translated and compiled by: Abu Rajab Ahmed Sheikhee

Taken from : http://aloloomenglish.net/vb/showthread.php?637-Fasting-of-Ashurah

RULING ON GIVING GIFTS TO THE GROOM OR BRIDE – SHAIKH IBN UL-UTHAYMEEN

RULING ON GIVING GIFTS TO THE GROOM OR BRIDE – SHAIKH IBN UL-UTHAYMEEN

Question: In regards to gifts which are given to the groom or the bride on the morning of the day of the wedding?

Answer: “Gifts are no doubt from the recommended affairs because gifts lead to love and affinity, especially if that is the custom. Verily, it removes the disgraceful misery from a person. This is in regards to the one giving. As for the one who is receiving the gift and it is the bride, then her accepting this gift is from the guidance of the Prophet sallahu alayhi wa salam. He sallahu alayhi wa salam used to accept the gifts and give gifts in return”.

[ Taken from :  https://darussaafi.wordpress.com/2014/07/18/ruling-on-giving-gifts-to-the-groom-or-bride-shaikh-ibn-ul-uthaymeen/ ]

Translated by

Faisal Ibn Abdul Qaadir Ibn Hassan
Abu Sulaymaan

THE RULING ON LOOKING AT ONE’S WATCH DURING THE KHUTBAH

THE RULING ON LOOKING AT ONE’S WATCH DURING THE KHUTBAH – SHAIKH ABDUL-MUHSIN AL-‘ABBAD

Question: Is looking at the watch, touching the beard, and scratching the skin, while the Imam is delivering the Khutbah, enter into idle speech?

Answer: “A person scratching his body when it itches does not effect [his khutbah]. What is prohibited is what busies from the Khutbah. Like that, him looking at his watch is not from idle speech. As for him taking out his watch if it is in his pocket, then fits into the category of touching the pebbles. As for him looking at his watch and it is on his hand, then there is no harm in it”

[Sharh Sunan Abi Dawood no. 139]

Translated by

Faisal Ibn Abdul Qaadir Ibn Hassan
Abu Sulaymaan