Prohibition of Looking into Someone’s House

Prohibition of Looking into Someone’s House

Shaykh-ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allaah have mercy upon him) said:

“Just as lowering the gaze includes not looking at the ‘awrahs of other people and other haraam things, it also includes refraining from looking into people’s houses. A man’s house conceals his body just as his garments conceal him. Allaah has mentioned lowering the gaze and guarding one’s private parts after the verse about asking for permission to enter, because the house covers a person just as the clothes on his body do.”

[Majmoo’ al-Fataawa,15/379]

The Ruling on Speaking Bad About a Specific Country and It’s People – Shaikh Abdul-Muhsin al-‘Abbad

May Allah grant us humility and understanding

Darussaafi's avatarSalafiyyah

Question: Does speaking about a people or a specific people of a land with what they dislike considered backbiting?

Answer: “This is backbiting no doubt because a person himself would not love anyone speaking about the people of his land or dispraise the people of his land because he is one of them”.

[Sharh Sunan Abi Dawood no. 557]

Translated by

Faisal Ibn Abdul Qaadir Ibn Hassan

Abu Sulaymaan

View original post

[Benefit] The Prohibition of Nutmeg

Darussaafi's avatarSalafiyyah

Imam Ibn Hajr al-Haytami rahimahulllah  said:

Major sin number 170: Consuming a pure intoxicant, like hashish (cannabis), opium, Shaykraan, which is an anesthetic, and like Anbar, Saffron, and Nutmeg…That which the Imam, al-Mujtahid Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Daqiq al-Eid clarified is that nutmeg is an intoxicant. It was recorded from him by the latter Scholars from the Shafiyyah and Malikiyyah. They relied upon his statement and prohibited it due to that. Rather, Ibn ‘Imaad exaggerated and made hashish (cannabis) the analogy for the mentioned nut…”

[az-Zawaajir ‘an Iqtiraaf al-Kaabir (1/355)]

Imam adh-Dhahabi rahimahullah said:

It acts similar to hashish (cannabis). The unemployed people add Saffron to it and become intoxicated so as to have a pleasurable time, digest their food, and aid them upon evil“.

[at-Tibb an-Nabawi pg. 98]

Shaikh al-Albani rahimahullah was asked:

Question: “Nutmeg, Oh Shaikh?

Shaikh: It is known that a lot of…

View original post 61 more words

Intoxicants and it’s negative outcomes

If someone drinks and is not intoxicated, the prayer is not accepted as long as it is in his system. If he is intoxicated, then prayer is not accepted for forty days.

Proof:

عَنِ ابْنِ عُمَرَ، قَالَ مَنْ شَرِبَ الْخَمْرَ فَلَمْ يَنْتَشِ لَمْ تُقْبَلْ لَهُ صَلاَةٌ مَادَامَ فِي جَوْفِهِ أَوْ عُرُوقِهِ مِنْهَا شَىْءٌ وَإِنْ مَاتَ مَاتَ كَافِرًا وَإِنِ انْتَشَى لَمْ تُقْبَلْ لَهُ صَلاَةٌ أَرْبَعِينَ لَيْلَةً وَإِنْ مَاتَ فِيهَا مَاتَ كَافِرًا

It was narrated that Ibn ‘Umar said:

“Whoever drinks Khamr and does not get intoxicated, his Salah will not be accepted so long as any trace of it remains in his belly or his veins, and if he dies he will die a Kafir. If he becomes intoxicated his Salah will not be accepted for 40 nights, and if he dies during them, he will die a Kafir.”

[Saheeh Targheeb no. 2383]

عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عَمْرٍو، قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ ـ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ ‏”‏ مَنْ شَرِبَ الْخَمْرَ وَسَكِرَ لَمْ تُقْبَلْ لَهُ صَلاَةٌ أَرْبَعِينَ صَبَاحًا وَإِنْ مَاتَ دَخَلَ النَّارَ فَإِنْ تَابَ تَابَ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ

“It was narrated from ‘Abdullah bin ‘Amr that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said:

“Whoever drinks wine and gets drunk, his prayer will not be accepted for forty days, and if he dies he will enter Hell, but if he repents, Allah will accept his repentance…”

[Saheeh Ibn Majah no. 2738]

Imam Abul-Hasan as-Sindi rahimahullah said:

ذكر في حكمة ذلك أنها تبقى في عروقه وأعضائه أربعين يوما نقله ابن القيم قول

It is mentioned that the wisdom of that is that the alcohol remains in his veins and limbs for forty days. This is what is recorded from Ibn Qayyim..”

[Hashiyat ‘ala Ibn Majah]

Imam al-Munaawi rahimahullah said:

ثم اعلم أن ذا وما أشبهه كمن شرب الخمر تلزمه الصلاة وإن لم تقبل، إذ معنى عدم القبول عدم الثواب لاستحقاق العقاب، فالصلاة مع القبول لفاعلها الثواب بلا عقاب، ومع نفيه لا ثواب ولا عقاب، هذا ما عليه النووي، لكن اعترض بأنه سبحانه لا يضيع أجر المحسنين فكيف يسقط ثواب صلاة صحيحة بمعصية لا حقة؟ فالأوجه أن يقال: المراد من عدم القبول عدم تضعيف الأجر؛ لكنه إذا فعلها بشروطها برئت ذمته من المطالبة بها ويفوته قبول الرضا عنه.

Then know that it and whatever is resembles it, like one who drinks alcohol, prayer is a must even though it is not accepted. The meaning of not accepted is the reward is not accepted due to deserving punishment. So the acceptance of the prayer for a person is reward without a punishment and its denial is no reward and no punishment. This is what an-Nawawi was upon. However, it was contradicted because the Exalted will not waste the reward of the good doers, so how does He deny the reward for the correct prayer due a disobedience which is not its right? So the answer is to say: the intent of not accepting the prayer is not multiplying the reward. However, if he performs it with its conditions, the responsibility is removed from him and its claim for it. He will miss the acceptance of pleasure for it”

[Fayd ul-Qadir]

And Allah Knows Best

Translated by

Faisal Ibn Abdul Qaadir Ibn Hassan

Abu Sulaymaan

The Ruling of Oversleeping when Fasting.

The Ruling of Oversleeping when Fasting.

Ash Shaykh Saalih al Fawzaan, may Allaah preserve him, was asked: There is a person who prohibits (the people from) over sleeping in Ramaadan and says” it is upon a Muslim to be awake and active, it is not
appropriate that he over sleeps”.So what is your opinion Oh noble
Shaykh?

A: Yes he should warn from over sleeping in this Month (Ramadaan), I
mean sleeping in the day (time) because it makes (one) lazy from
performing acts of obedience, perhaps it may cause one to miss the congregation prayer or it may cause the time for (that specific prayer) to pass by. What is requested from a Muslim is that he be energetic in
acts of obedience and (that) he sleeps in the night, especially in the
first part of it (the night), so he can arise in the morning energetic to perform and participate in acts of obedience.

The Reference: al Muntaqaa, (111/5) , fatwa number:167

At What Amount can a Lost Item be kept and at What Amount Does it Need to be Announced – Shaikh Ibn ul-Uthaymeen

Darussaafi's avatarSalafiyyah

Question: What is the highest amount of lost money that is allowed to be picked up in this time period?

Shaikh: Do you mean that which will belong to him by picking it up or the amount that is allowed to be announced that it is lost?

Questioner: That will belong to him by picking it up

Answer: ” that is because their is difference between them. So that which is allowed to announce as lost is any lost item even if it reaches millions. However, that which will belong to the one who picks it up differs according to the difference in conditions and people. In the past, one dirham was expensive with the people. It was followed with concern. In our time, it is possible ten riyals is not important. If a person lost ten dirhams, he would not search after it except if…

View original post 75 more words

Raising the Hands in Congregational Supplication – Shaikh Bin Baz

Darussaafi's avatarSalafiyyah

Question: Sometimes after the class or lesson: the speaker makes supplication and he raises his hands. So do we sit with him during this collective supplication or leave before the speaker begins making the supplication?

Answer: “There is no harm in supplicating after the lecture or after an admonishment or reminder, there is no harm in making supplication. Supplicating for the attendees for Tawfeeq (divine success), guidance, correctness of intention, action. However, raising the hands for the likes of this, then I do not know any evidence for it. I do not know raising the hands was reported from the Prophet sallahu alayhi wa salam except in general. Generally raising the hands and it is the means of supplication to be answered. However, it is not preserved that the Prophet sallahu alayhi wa salam used to give a admonishment to the people, remind them, then raise his…

View original post 113 more words

RULING ON WORKING IN A PLACE WHERE THERE ARE

RULING ON WORKING IN A PLACE WHERE THERE ARE WOMEN – SHAIKH IBN UL-UTHAYMEEN

Question: If a man is in a land in which it is difficult for him to work in a place where their is no women, since many women work in this land. So what is the ruling of this work because the fields which the women are in are most departments? Should I leave it?

Answer: “If it is possible for him to work in a place where their is no women, then let him leave this place which has women and work there. If it is not possible for him and he needs work, then he works and is eager in staying away from women and lowers his gaze.

فَاتَّقُوا اللَّهَ مَا اسْتَطَعْتُمْ

So keep your duty to Allah and fear Him as much as you can [64:16]

If we are in, for example, a land where women go out showing their bodies and are adorned, can we say: Do not go out for prayer because the market is full of these women? No. Do we say: Do not go out to get the needs of the house? No. If you need to work in this place in which there is women and you can not find other than it and you are in need of money, then work and be eager is staying away from women and lower your gaze”.

[Taken from: http://shamela.ws/browse.php/book-7687/page-2311#page-3766 ]

Translated by

Faisal Ibn Abdul Qaadir Ibn Hassan
Abu Sulaymaan

HOW TO MOVE THE FINGER IN TASHAHHUD?

HOW TO MOVE THE FINGER IN TASHAHHUD? – SHAIKH AL-ALBANI

Question: What is the way of moving the finger in Salah-in the Tashahhud?

Answer: There is the Hadith of Wa’il ibn Hujr that he saw the Prophet sallahu alayhi wa salam when he sat in Tashahhud in Salah. He said:

فَرَأَيْتُهُ يُحَرِّكُهَا يَدْعُو بِهَا ‏

“So I saw him moving it, supplicating with it” [Saheeh Sunan Nasai no. 888]

This movement does not mean lowering and raising and this did not come in a Hadith at all. As for the intent of the movement, then it is a movement in its place. It is authentic from Imam Ahmad rahimahullah that he said: “He moves it vigorously“.

[Fataawa al-‘Emaaraat no. 4]

Translated by Faisal ibn Abdul Qaadir ibn Hassan