The Ruling on Attending Training Sessions Which Have Free-Mixing Between Men and Women – Shaikh Ibn ul-‘Uthaymeen
Question: What is the ruling on attending training sessions which have free-mixing between men and women?
Answer: “If a necessity calls for that, then there is no harm, along with avoiding communicating with women and looking at them with desire”*.
[‘Ilaam ul-Musaafireen pg. 86]
* Translator’s Note:
With that being said, the Shaikh’s final view on the issue of attending free-mixing schools or areas is that it is prohibited. The following is the last fatwa the Shaikh gave on the issue, which was a few months before he passed away rahimahullah.
He was asked:
Question: What is the ruling on studying medicine in a free-mixing university. Is this considered a Legislated need?
Answer: “This is not a Legislated need. It is obligatory upon those responsible of the Islamic country to separate between the men and women because free-mixing is an issue. If the people stopped entering into studies, enrolling in universities, and what resembles that of free-mixing, it would force the ruler to distinguish and separate. I see that it is not allowed to have free-mixing in medicine and nor other than it.
Questioner: Even in the Legislated Sciences?
Answer: “Even in the Legislated Sciences except if the women gather in a [separate] place, which they enter from a [separate] door and exit from a [separate] door and there is no free-mixing with men”.
[Tape: Kalimah ila Du’aat al-Jazaair recorded 23 Safar 1421 found here: aloloom.net/vb/showthread.php?t=14870]
Translated by
Faisal Ibn Abdul Qaadir Ibn Hassan
Abu Sulaymaan
Fatawa
Mothers Day | Sh.Uthaymeen
The Ruling Concerning Celebrating Mother’s Day.Question:
Every year we have a holiday on a particular day and it is called Mother’s Day. It occurs on March 21. All the people gather and celebrate on that day. Is this permissible or forbidden?
Answer:
Every holiday or celebration that differs from Shariah celebrations is a newly invented innovation that was not known during the time of the Pious Predecessors. Furthermore, it may have begun as an imitation of the Non-Muslims. Therefore, in addition to it being an innovation, it may be an act of resembling the enemies of Allah.
The Shariah holidays are well known among the Muslims. These are the Eid al-Fitr, Eid al-Adha and the weekly Eid [Fridays]. There is no holiday or festival in Islaam other than those three. Every holiday that is invented besides them is to be rejected as an innovation and falsehood in the Shariah . This is because the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alaihi-wasallam) said,
” Every deed introduced into our affair that does not belong to it is rejected .” [1]
That is, it is rejected from that person and it will not be accepted by Allah. Another wording of the hadeeth states,
”Whoever does a deed that is not what our affair is upon, will have it rejected .” [2]
Since that is clear, the holiday that is mentioned by the questioner, known as Mother’s day, is not allowed. It is not allowed to have during such day any kind of public display and celebration, happiness, giving of presents and so forth.
It is obligatory upon a Muslim to have pride in his religion. He should also limit himself to what Allah and his Messenger (sallallaahu ‘alaihi-wasallam) have restricted this upright religion to. This is the religion Allah is pleased to have His servants follow. There can be no addition and no subtraction from this. Furthermore, a Muslim should not be a kind of weak person that follows every Tom, Dick and Harry. Instead, his personality should be that defined by the Law of Allah, such that he is followed and not a follower, such that he becomes an example and not a disciple. This should be the case because the Law of Allah, Praise be to Allah, is complete and perfect in all aspects. Allah says in he Qur’an,
” This day I have perfected your religion for you, completed My favour upon you and have chosen for you islaam as your religion .” al-Maidah :3
Furthermore, the mother has much more right than to have just one day in the year as a celebration for her. In fact, the women has a right upon her children, that they will care for her, look after her, obey her in anything which is not sinful, during all times and at all places.
________________________
[1] Recorded by al-Bukhari, and Muslim.
[2] Recorded by Muslim, and by al-Bukhari in mualaq form.
Shaykh Muhammad bin Saalih al-`Uthaymeen
Islamic Fatawa Regarding Women – Darussalam Pg.56-57
Sleeping past the time of salat | Sh.Uthaymeen
Imam Al Uthaymeen mentioned regarding the narration:
Of Abu Qatadah Radiallahu anhu when the prophet Sallallahu Alaihi Wassallam and the companions slept past a prayer:
From the benefits of this hadeeth is that:
“The one sleeping is excused and doesn’t sin, this is restricted to if there isn’t with him anyone to wake him up, but if there is someone with him that will wake him up for the prayer and he wakes him up for the prayer but he is slow and lazy then he isn’t excused.
If a person says to him: Stand for the prayer, and he woke up but returned to his sleep then he has no excuse.
If there isn’t anyone to wake him up and he took the precautionary measures but he wasn’t able to pray (because he couldn’t wake up) except after the rising of the sun then there is no sin upon him because there was no negligence in regards to the sleep.
Explanation of Bulughul Maraam 2/104
The permissibility of a man asking for religious leadership which he intends from it the reward from Allah | Sh. Fawzan
It was narrated that ‘Uthman bin Abi Al-As said:
“I said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, make me the Imam of my people.’ He said: ‘You are their Imam, so consider the weakest among them and choose a Mu’adhdhin who does not accept any payment for his Adhan.'”
Declared Authentic By Imam Al Albaani (Saheehul Jaamia 1480) and Imam Muqbil (As Saheehul Musnad 906)
Shaykh Saalih Al Fawzaan said:
Thus this narration indicates upon the permissibility of a man asking for religious leadership which he intends from it the reward from Allah Subhanaahu Wa Taala. The Imam is a religious position which rewards are intended from it. There is no problem with seeking it (wanting to be the Imam) desiring in goodness, as for if the position is a worldly position such as the leadership or office, then the man doesn’t ask for it, because the prohibition has come regarding asking for the leadership and that the one who asks for it will be entrusted to it and he who doesn’t ask for it will be aided upon it.
بلوغ المرام من ادلة الاحكام
With footnotes and checking
Print: Dar Umar Ibn Al Khattab
Page 74
The Ruling on Straightening the Beard if One Side is Longer Than the Other – Shaikh Abdul-Muhsin al-‘Abbad
The Ruling on Straightening the Beard if One Side is Longer Than the Other – Shaikh Abdul-Muhsin al-‘Abbad
Question: If one side of a person’s beard is longer than the other, is it allowed for him to straighten it if its form distorts the face?
Answer: “What is apparent, and Allah knows best, is that a person does not do this. A person does not do anything [to change it]. Allah created the creation [i.e. this person in this form]”.
[Sharh Tirmidhi no. 300]
Translated by
Faisal Ibn Abdul Qaadir Ibn Hassan
Abu Sulaymaan
Wearing sport jerseys
The Lajnah ad-Da’imah was asked the following question :
The Question :What is the ruling on wearing sports outfits that bear logos of non-Muslims such as sports T-Shirts with Italian, German, and American logos or those bearing the names of non-Muslim players?
The Answer : Wearing the outfits that bear logos of non-Muslims has some details:
1 – If such logos refer to the religions of the disbelievers, such as the Cross and the like, it is impermissible to import, sell, or wear these clothes.
2 – If these logos glorify a non-Muslim figure by putting his picture or writing his name on the sporting outfit, this is also Haram (prohibited).
3 – If these logos neither refer to any kind of worship nor glorification of a certain person, rather they are just ordinary commercial logos, then there is no harm in wearing such outfits.
May Allah grant us success.
May peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad, his family, and Companions.
The Permanent Committee for Scholarly Research and Ifta’
An excerpt from alifta.net.
Ruling on spoken word
We asked Shaikh Saleem al-Hilali hafidhuhallah about spoken word during one of our classes and he said it is allowed.
Obviously it should be free of haram things like bad speech as comes in the Hadith:
عَنْ عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ عَمْرٍو قَالَ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم: الشِّعْرُ بِمَنْزِلَةِ الْكَلاَمِ، حَسَنُهُ كَحَسَنِ الْكَلامِ، وَقَبِيحُهُ كَقَبِيحِ الْكَلامِ
‘Abdullah ibn ‘Amr reported that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, “Poetry is in the same position as speech. The good of it is like good words and its bad part is like bad words.” [Saheeh Adab al-Mufrad no. 865]
Or taking a wage or imitating the disbelievers.
And Allah Knows Best
Faisal Ibn Abdul Qaadir Ibn Hassan
Abu Sulaymaan
The Ruling on Breaking the Prayer If Someone is Stealing From Your Bag- Shaikh Ibn ul-‘Uthaymeen
Question: The questioner says: One day I was praying and I had a bag which had an amount of money in it. Then I put it in front of me because my pocket was not big enough for it. So during the prayer, one person, from those with weak souls, came in front and stole it and escaped quickly. I was unable to cut my prayer to catch him. Is me allowing him to take it and flee while desiring the congregational prayer a correct action? Or is it obligatory to cut the prayer to catch him even if the money is a little?
Answer: “In this situation, if the prayer is voluntary, then no doubt that it is allowed for you to cut it in order to protect your wealth. As for if it is an obligatory prayer, then it is also allowed for you to cut your prayer in order to protect your wealth and catch this oppressor and transgressor. If you cut the prayer in this situation, then for you is the reward of the congregation because you did no cut the prayer except for an excuse. If you cut the prayer to protect your wealth and preserve it for yourself, and also save this man from this oppression and transgression due to the Prophet (ﷺ) said:
نصر أخاك ظالما أو مظلوما
Help your brother, whether he is an oppressor or is oppressed
[Bukhari and Muslim]
(and he (ﷺ) clarified that helping an oppressor is by you stopping him from oppression), if you did his, then it is more deserving for you. What is important is that cutting the obligatory prayer or voluntary prayer in the likes of his situation, there is no harm in it to protect your wealth and prevent others from oppression.
Questioner: Even if the money is a little?
Shaikh: Yes, even if the money is a little because it is wasting money if you left it. Also, it will tempt this oppressor to transgress another time from another person.
Questioner: [I ask] in this occasion, what are the things or situations which it is allowed to cut the prayer?
Shaikh: There are many situations. From them: is if he fears for himself harm if he remains in prayer, [if] he fears harm to his wealth, and [if] he fears harm to an innocent person. For example, he witnesses a person attack another person in order to kill him or violate his honor or he sees a snake facing someone or wild animal or what resembles that. In this situation, he cuts the prayer to rescue an innocent person because rescuing an innocent person is obligatory. It [rescuing an innocent person] will be lost if he continues his prayer. As for continuing the prayer, it is obligatory [in general]; however, it is possible for him to catch it after rescuing an innocent person from destruction”.
[Fatawa Noor ‘ala Darb no. 197]
Translated by
Faisal Ibn Abdul Qaadir Ibn Hassan
Abu Sulaymaan
The Ruling on April Fool’s
The Ruling on April Fool’s
Shaikh Salih al-Fawzan hafidhuhallah was asked:
Question: Oh Virtuous Shaikh, this questioner is saying: we hope from the Shaikh (may Allah preserve him) some advice to the general Ummah specifically about April Fool’s which repeats year after year.
Answer: “This is imported in general from the false customs and it is not from the actions of the Muslims. Lying is not allowed. Not in April or in other than it. Lying is haram. Lying upon Allah, lying upon the Messenger (ﷺ), lying upon the people is haram. It is a major sin from the major sins. Allah forbid lying, prohibited it, and threatened the liars. It is not allowed in any time. Yes”.
[http://www.alfawzan.af.org.sa/node/13604]
Shaikh Ibn ul-‘Uthaymeen rahimahullah said:
“…In this occasion I warn my Muslim brothers from what some of the foolish ones do of April Fool’s. I think it is soon. This lie which came from the Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians, and the people of disbelief, then it is lying and lying is prohibited legislatively. It is an imitation of the disbelievers and imitation of the disbelievers is prohibited. The Prophet (ﷺ) said:
مَنْ تَشَبَّهَ بِقَوْمٍ, فَهُوَ مِنْهُمْ
He who imitates any people (in their actions) is considered to be one of them
[Saheeh Sunan Abi Dawood no.2031]
Shaikhul Islaam ibn Taymiyyah rahimahullah said the chain is Jayyid. The least of the situations is that it is prohibited even if the apparent [meaning of the Hadith] necessitates disbelieve by imitating them…Fourth, most times this filthy lying includes consuming the wealth in falsehood or scaring the Muslims. Sometimes he lies and lies to the people of the house saying so and so said: you will be visited by a group today. So they cook a lot of food and meat and what resembles that. Or sometimes they inform them of an affair that scares them. Like he says: your guardian was run over by a car or the likes, which is not allowed even outside this situation [i.e. April Fool’s]. So it is upon the Muslim to fear Allah, the Exalted and to be mighty through his religion, proud of it, pleased with it so that the enemies may have awe of the Muslims and respect him…”
[Fatawa Noor ‘ala Darb no. 34]
Translated by
Faisal Ibn Abdul Qaadir Ibn Hassan
Abu Sulaymaan
This is along with what our brother Abu Tayyib already translated:
A man who stayed away from his wife for a month or two months | Sh. Ibn Taymiyyah
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) was asked about a man who stayed away from his wife for a month or two months and did not have intercourse with her; was there any sin on him or not? Could the husband be asked to do that?
He replied:
The husband is obliged to have intercourse with his wife on a reasonable basis, which is one of the most important rights that she has over him; it is more important than feeding her. It was said that what is obligatory with regard to intercourse is once every four months, or according to her need and his ability, just as he should feed her according to her need and his ability. And the latter is the more correct opinion.
Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa, 32/271
