Mothers Day | Sh.Uthaymeen 

The Ruling Concerning Celebrating Mother’s Day.Question:
Every year we have a holiday on a particular day and it is called Mother’s Day. It occurs on March 21. All the people gather and celebrate on that day. Is this permissible or forbidden?

Answer:
Every holiday or celebration that differs from Shariah celebrations is a newly invented innovation that was not known during the time of the Pious Predecessors. Furthermore, it may have begun as an imitation of the Non-Muslims. Therefore, in addition to it being an innovation, it may be an act of resembling the enemies of Allah.

The Shariah holidays are well known among the Muslims. These are the Eid al-Fitr, Eid al-Adha and the weekly Eid [Fridays]. There is no holiday or festival in Islaam other than those three. Every holiday that is invented besides them is to be rejected as an innovation and falsehood in the Shariah . This is because the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alaihi-wasallam) said,
” Every deed introduced into our affair that does not belong to it is rejected .” [1]
That is, it is rejected from that person and it will not be accepted by Allah. Another wording of the hadeeth states,
”Whoever does a deed that is not what our affair is upon, will have it rejected .” [2]
Since that is clear, the holiday that is mentioned by the questioner, known as Mother’s day, is not allowed. It is not allowed to have during such day any kind of public display and celebration, happiness, giving of presents and so forth.
It is obligatory upon a Muslim to have pride in his religion. He should also limit himself to what Allah and his Messenger (sallallaahu ‘alaihi-wasallam) have restricted this upright religion to. This is the religion Allah is pleased to have His servants follow. There can be no addition and no subtraction from this. Furthermore, a Muslim should not be a kind of weak person that follows every Tom, Dick and Harry. Instead, his personality should be that defined by the Law of Allah, such that he is followed and not a follower, such that he becomes an example and not a disciple. This should be the case because the Law of Allah, Praise be to Allah, is complete and perfect in all aspects. Allah says in he Qur’an,
” This day I have perfected your religion for you, completed My favour upon you and have chosen for you islaam as your religion .” al-Maidah :3
Furthermore, the mother has much more right than to have just one day in the year as a celebration for her. In fact, the women has a right upon her children, that they will care for her, look after her, obey her in anything which is not sinful, during all times and at all places.
________________________
[1] Recorded by al-Bukhari, and Muslim.
[2] Recorded by Muslim, and by al-Bukhari in mualaq form.
Shaykh Muhammad bin Saalih al-`Uthaymeen

Islamic Fatawa Regarding Women – Darussalam Pg.56-57

Benefit regarding praying in pants | Sh. Uthaymeen 

Question: Oh Virtuous Shaikh! Many congregants who wear pants [during the prayer], while in the position of prostration or bowing their awrah uncovers from above and they do not know that. So what is the ruling on that?
Answer: “There is no doubt that by wearing pants something will be missed in the prayer. First: complete tranquility while sitting [will be missing]. So like this, you find that those who wear pants sit on their heels [during prayer] along with bending their back a little.
Also, it prevents complete prostration. Sometimes the pants shrink and the top of the awrah uncovers, if what he is wearing on top does not hang down [to cover the awrah].
First: it is necessary not to wear pants because the Qamees is more concealing, spacious, and better for a person.
Second: if he wears pants due to a need like being a policeman and other than that, then let the pants be spacious so that he can do the prayer according to what is necessary. As well, what he wears above it should be apparent [i.e. covering], so that if the pants shrink when he prostrates, that which is above it will be concealing [his awrah]”.
[Liqaa Bab al-Maftooh no. 100]
Translated by
Faisal Ibn Abdul Qaadir Ibn Hassan

Abu Sulaymaan

The Ruling on Joining an Islamic University and One’s Parents are Not Pleased – Shaikh Abdul-Muhsin al-‘Abbad

The Ruling on Joining an Islamic University and One’s Parents are Not Pleased – Shaikh Abdul-Muhsin al-‘Abbad

by darussaafi

Question: Some students leave studying medicine and engineering and other than it from the colleges and join the Islamic university. Their families are not pleased with that. So is that considered disobedience? What is your advice?

Answer: “This is not disobedience because if a person goes to seek knowledge, learn the truth, act upon it, and call towards it, then this is desired. However, it is necessary for him along with that to please his family, do good to them, do what it is possible for him to do from the affairs that will please them. As for leaving knowledge due to them, then he does not do that. Rather he continues seeking knowledge. However, he is eager along with that to please them and improve their thoughts [regarding the situation] by any means possible”.

[Sharh Sunan Abi Dawood no. 402]

Translated by

Faisal Ibn Abdul Qaadir Ibn Hassan

Abu Sulaymaan

Wearing sport jerseys

The Lajnah ad-Da’imah was asked the following question :

The Question :What is the ruling on wearing sports outfits that bear logos of non-Muslims such as sports T-Shirts with Italian, German, and American logos or those bearing the names of non-Muslim players?

The Answer : Wearing the outfits that bear logos of non-Muslims has some details:

1 – If such logos refer to the religions of the disbelievers, such as the Cross and the like, it is impermissible to import, sell, or wear these clothes.

2 – If these logos glorify a non-Muslim figure by putting his picture or writing his name on the sporting outfit, this is also Haram (prohibited).

3 – If these logos neither refer to any kind of worship nor glorification of a certain person, rather they are just ordinary commercial logos, then there is no harm in wearing such outfits.

May Allah grant us success.

May peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad, his family, and Companions.

The Permanent Committee for Scholarly Research and Ifta’

An excerpt from alifta.net.

Ruling on spoken word

We asked Shaikh Saleem al-Hilali hafidhuhallah about spoken word during one of our classes and he said it is allowed.

Obviously it should be free of haram things like bad speech as comes in the Hadith:

‎عَنْ عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ عَمْرٍو قَالَ‏:‏ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم‏:‏ الشِّعْرُ بِمَنْزِلَةِ الْكَلاَمِ، حَسَنُهُ كَحَسَنِ الْكَلامِ، وَقَبِيحُهُ كَقَبِيحِ الْكَلامِ

‘Abdullah ibn ‘Amr reported that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, “Poetry is in the same position as speech. The good of it is like good words and its bad part is like bad words.” [Saheeh Adab al-Mufrad no. 865]

Or taking a wage or imitating the disbelievers.

And Allah Knows Best

Faisal Ibn Abdul Qaadir Ibn Hassan
Abu Sulaymaan

The Ruling on April Fool’s

The Ruling on April Fool’s

Shaikh Salih al-Fawzan hafidhuhallah was asked:

Question: Oh Virtuous Shaikh, this questioner is saying: we hope from the Shaikh (may Allah preserve him) some advice to the general Ummah specifically about April Fool’s which repeats year after year.

Answer: “This is imported in general from the false customs and it is not from the actions of the Muslims. Lying is not allowed. Not in April or in other than it. Lying is haram. Lying upon Allah, lying upon the Messenger (ﷺ), lying upon the people is haram. It is a major sin from the major sins. Allah forbid lying, prohibited it, and threatened the liars. It is not allowed in any time. Yes”.

[http://www.alfawzan.af.org.sa/node/13604]

Shaikh Ibn ul-‘Uthaymeen rahimahullah said:

“…In this occasion I warn my Muslim brothers from what some of the foolish ones do of April Fool’s. I think it is soon. This lie which came from the Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians, and the people of disbelief, then it is lying and lying is prohibited legislatively. It is an imitation of the disbelievers and imitation of the disbelievers is prohibited. The Prophet (ﷺ) said:

مَنْ تَشَبَّهَ بِقَوْمٍ, فَهُوَ مِنْهُمْ

He who imitates any people (in their actions) is considered to be one of them

[Saheeh Sunan Abi Dawood no.2031]

Shaikhul Islaam ibn Taymiyyah rahimahullah said the chain is Jayyid. The least of the situations is that it is prohibited even if the apparent [meaning of the Hadith] necessitates disbelieve by imitating them…Fourth, most times this filthy lying includes consuming the wealth in falsehood or scaring the Muslims. Sometimes he lies and lies to the people of the house saying so and so said: you will be visited by a group today. So they cook a lot of food and meat and what resembles that. Or sometimes they inform them of an affair that scares them. Like he says: your guardian was run over by a car or the likes, which is not allowed even outside this situation [i.e. April Fool’s]. So it is upon the Muslim to fear Allah, the Exalted and to be mighty through his religion, proud of it, pleased with it so that the enemies may have awe of the Muslims and respect him…”

[Fatawa Noor ‘ala Darb no. 34]

Translated by

Faisal Ibn Abdul Qaadir Ibn Hassan
Abu Sulaymaan

This is along with what our brother Abu Tayyib already translated:

http://torontodawah.com/?p=727

If this path is for other then the Muslims is it permissible for a person to relieve oneself in it? | Sh. Uthaymeen

Shaykh Al Uthaymeen said:

If this path is for other then the Muslims is it permissible for a person to relieve oneself in it?

Answer:

No, because the hadeeth with the narration in Muslim “The one who relieves himself in the pathway of the people”

He didn’t restrict it to the Muslims.

The religion of Islam is not a religion of transgression and harm, as long as there is between us and those disbelievers a covenant or protection, then it is not permissible for us to harm them!!

Explanation of Bulughul Maraam 1/411

Translated by Majid Jawed

Al-Imaam Ibnul-Qayim Mentions The Reality of Free Mixing And It’s Harms

Al-Imaam Ibnul-Qayim Mentions The Reality of Free Mixing And It’s Harms

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

Al-Imaam, Al-Allaamah, Al-Muhaqqiq, Abu Abdillah Muhammad bin Abee Bakr bin Ayyuub bin Al-Qayyim Al-Jawziyyah (May Allah shower His Mercy upon him) says about the the reality of free mixing:

“And there is no doubt that enabling the women from their free mixing with the men is the origin of every disaster and every evil and it is from the greatest means for the descending of public punishments as it is also from the means for corrupting the general and specific affairs and the free mixing of men with the women is a cause for frequenct evil acts and Zinaa (adultery) and it is also from the means of widespread death and constant plagues!!”

Source – Ad-Duruq Al-Hukmiyah Page 724, V. 2

Translated by – Younus bin Muhammad

Honest thoughts on dating | Br. Samuel Pierre

MY HONEST THOUGHTS ON DATE | Br. Samuel Pierre 

Rose_single

I tell people romance is nonsense and they immediately say “brother, you’re not married are you?”

I’m sure you think that’s funny. I do too, but for different reasons. You see, I’m an anthropologist. We study humanity. Primarily through culture and religion. With this we become aware of the origins of words and their original meaning in the context of the culture and wider civilization in which the word and it’s associated concept originated and developed. We ask people all the time, why do you think the opposite of romance is “not caring” rather than loving? And we ask the people why is it in the modern world when people say “relationship” we automatically think “romance”. It’s no coincidence that when people update their status to “in a relationship”, people automatically assume you’re in a haraam relationship.

Romance originated in Greco-Roman culture. This is the context. This type of relationship is rooted in their understanding of the relationship between men and women(and men and men, and women and women). Indeed, the boyfriend/girlfriend relationship is an inevitable consequence of their beliefs. Indeed the Modern Western Civilization is simply the revival of the Greco-Roman Civilization.

But what is romance?

Romance is utilizing words and gestures designed to appeal to the ego of another, in order to ingratiate that person to yourself, creating an (unhealthy) emotional attachment, so that this person will be more amenable to fulfilling your whims and desires. It’s essentially a manipulative relationship, where one person attempts to use another selfishly, by controlling them emotionally, and eventually psychologically, so that their goals for self-worship, control, and security are accomplished through another person. And many are deceived because romance mimics love in many respects. But we all know that nothing can substitute the real thing.

You think I’m lying or intellectualizing something simple? Well, you’re free to research on your own.

Romance:

1. Talk or behave amorously, without serious intentions.

2. Tell exaggerated lies

3. Tell an untruth; pretend with intent to deceive
4. To attempt to gain the affection of.
5. A kind of excitement.
6. To try to persuade, as with flattery or incentives.
7. To court the favor of or woo.
8. A mysterious, exciting, sentimental, or nostalgic quality.
9. Idealized love.
10. To indulge in fanciful stories or daydreams.

I can’t even make this stuff up.

Key word in Romance is Rom(an). Roman civilization is basically Greek.

 

MY HONEST THOUGHTS ON DATING:

Because what most people actually want in the boyfriend/girlfriend relationship is exactly what people want in their marriage, I think dating, even if I wasn’t religious, is a pure waste of time. The phrase: “If he truly loves you, he will marry you”, makes so much sense to me…

It just seems that men get so much more out of the dating relationship than women, simply because of the way patriarchal societies condition(read:brainwash) men and women. Men basically get a wife without the commitment(a wifey). And women get to hope against all hope that one day their love decides to marry her(it rarely happens)…I don’t see the appeal in it for women.

And if you think that I am somehow relinquishing some fictitious “man-card” or violating some “man-law”, then you and I are not on the same page. I am Muslim. We do not believe in entering into relationships that are not of mutual benefit. Use things, not people.

Never mind the cognitive dissonance of “how you gonna know if someone is right for you unless you ‘get to know them’?; Every successful marriage began with “I knew the moment I saw her”, so that excuse is out.

People brainwash themselves in order justify and satisfy their own desires sometimes. We all know what “getting to know you” actually means; We all know that you can get to know someone without dating them before marriage; We all know that we can never actually know everything about anyone; And we all know that the missing ingredient in failed marriages is not desire, but genuine friendship.

Written by Samuel Pierre